<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unicode Code Converter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toufexis.info/archives/96/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toufexis.info/archives/96</link>
	<description>This is the professional website of Notis Toufexis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notis Toufexis</title>
		<link>http://www.toufexis.info/archives/96/comment-page-1#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Notis Toufexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toufexis.info/?p=96#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Ego-surf I like! I just wanted to make people aware of the fact that although the glyphs look the same, the underlying Unicode characters are different. And sure enough, I haven&#039;t really quoted you precisely here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ego-surf I like! I just wanted to make people aware of the fact that although the glyphs look the same, the underlying Unicode characters are different. And sure enough, I haven&#8217;t really quoted you precisely here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.toufexis.info/archives/96/comment-page-1#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toufexis.info/?p=96#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Stumbled here through ego-surf. :-) My impression is, it&#039;s the other way round: the fonts I&#039;d listed, way back when, were the ones *not* conflating tonos and acute, and the mainstream now is to conflate them. As indeed Greece does officially. So I think this a non-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbled here through ego-surf. <img src='http://www.toufexis.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  My impression is, it&#8217;s the other way round: the fonts I&#8217;d listed, way back when, were the ones *not* conflating tonos and acute, and the mainstream now is to conflate them. As indeed Greece does officially. So I think this a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
